|
AMINOGLYCOSIDES
Pharmacokinetic Parameters and TDM Information
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination half-life* “t1/2”
|
|
|
0.5-3.0 hr (healthy young <30y, with normal renal function) 1.5-15.0 hr (healthy old >30y, with normal renal function) 0.5-2.5 hr (children) & 2-9 hr (neonates)
|
|
|
|
Gentamicin Tobramycin Amikacin Netilmicin
|
|
|
2.0+3.0 hr 2.2+1.0 hr 2.3+0.4 hr
2.3+0.7 hr
|
|
|
Total body clearance* “TBC”
|
|
|
1.51+0.63 ml/min/kg (healthy young & normal renal function)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume of distribution “V”
|
|
|
0.15-0.25 L/kg hr (normal fluid status) 0.07-0.15 L/kg hr (dehydrated patients) 0.07-0.7 L/kg hr (dehydrated children) 0.2-0.7 L/kg hr (dehydrated neonates)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peaks (mg/ml)
Serious inf. Life-threat. inf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troughs (mg/ml)
Serious inf. Life-threat. inf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Administration by either IM injection or IV bolus injection by 30 to 60 minutes intermittent infusions. Continuous IV infusion, although it is applicable but not save.
- The general daily dosage regimens for gentamicin, tobramycin and netilemicin are 3-5mg/kg/day “divided as 3 equal doses (infants 2-2.5mg/kg/day divided as 3 equal doses while
children > 2 years the recommended dosage is 5mg/kg/day divided as 2 equql doses.
- The general daily dosage regimens for amikacin are 15mg/kg/day “divided as 2-3 equal doses.
- Dosage regimens should be decreased according to the degree of renal dysfunction in renal inpairment.
- However, the dose should be individualized
|
|
|
*Aminoglycoside clearance is highly dependent on renal function. **Volume of distribution, is generally about 25% of the lean body weight, but highly variable
#Several factors should be considered in selecting a desired peak and trough concentration: clinical condition,
the site of infection, the relative sensitivity of the isolated or suspected pathogen, and the ratio between the peak serum concentration to the MIC. These suggested concentrations are general guidelines which may needed to be
modified for selected patients. *** Single daily doses of aminoglycosides have been recently recommended and it was effective and may be less
toxic than multiple daily dose regimens as nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity have been argued to be related to exposure time. However, the clinical trial were limited to small patient numbers with mild infection, therefore, these
clinical results are inconclusive and should not be extrapolated to routine clinical treatment.
|
Individualiz-ation of the dosage regimens*
|
|
|
Three post-infusion samples are collected for determining the pharmacokinetic parameters of each patient and upon which dosage regimes are individualized
- First serum sample should be collected 15-30min. post infusion for patients with normal renal function who received a 60 minute infusion and should be delayed 1-2hr post infusion
for patients with renal dysfunction
- The 2nd & 3rd samples are obtained within the initial 2-3 hrs post-infusion for patients > 30y with normal renal function (3-4 hrs for older patients with normal renal dysfunction)
- For patients with renal impairment: four times serum creatinine estimates one half-life; the 2nd & 3rd samples should estimate t1/2.
Calculations:
- From the line of best fit, the elimination rate constant (k) and the serum concentration on the regression line at zero time post-infusion (c¥)max. The drug distribution volume is calculated by the following equation:
- V=Ro/k[(1-e-kt1)/ (c¥max - c¥min. e-kt1)]. Where Ro is the infusion rate,t1 is the infusion period and (c¥)min is the predose concentration.
- τ ( dosing interval) –1/k ln[desired trough/ desired peak] + t1. The calculated dosage intervals are then rounded to clinically practical intervals of 4, 6, 8, 12, or 24 hours.
- The infusion rate in mg/hour = kV[desired peak][1-e-kτ/1-e-kt1].
- The dose = Ro . t1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak: 30 minutes after completion of a 1/2-1 hr infusion 1 hr after IM administration
Trough: Immediately prior the next IM or IV dose.
|
|
|
*Many factors may change the clearance or the apparent volume of distribution during the course of
aminoglycoside therapy and affect concentrations and dosage requirement. Therefore aminoglycoside therapy requires monitoring of serum creatinine or urea nitrogen, although, serum concentrations may rise before a
change in serum creatinine is noted
Relationship between Aminoglycoside Toxicity and Plasma Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is largely irreversible. It results from progressive destruction of vestibular or cochlear sensory cells which are highly sensitive to damage by aminoglycosides.
Aminoglycosides can accumulate in the otic fluids (pre- and endo-lymph of the inner ear) specially when the concentrations in the plasma are high. Diffusion back into the blood stream is very slow;
the t1/2of aminoglycosides in the otic fluids is 5-6 times longer than in the plasma. Back diffusion is concentration-dependent and is facilitated only when the concentration of the drug
in the plasma reaches a trough. Thus ototoxicity is more evident in patients with persistently continuos elevated plasma drug levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 8-26% of patients who receive an aminoglycoside for more than several days will develop mild renal impairment. The renal damage is due to marked accumulation
and avid retention of aminoglycoside in the proximal tubular cells. The initial damage at this site is manifested by the excretion of enzymes of the renal tubular brush border. After several
days there is a defect in renal concentrating ability, mild protienuria, and the appearance of hyaline and granular casts. While severe acute tubular necrosis may occur rarely, the most common
significant finding is a mild rise in plasma creatinine, hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia are seen very infrequently. The impairment in renal function is almost always reversible, since the proximal
tubular cells can regenerate. Nephrotoxicity correlates with the total amount of drug administered. Consequently, is more likely to be encountered with longer courses of therapy. Continuous infusion
is more nephrotoxic than intermittant dosing
|
|
|
|
Constant plasma drug concentrations above a critical level, which is manifested by elevated trough serum concentrations correlate with aminoglycoside toxicity.
|
|
|
|
In general, the dose-response data would indicate gentamicin to be the most toxic, followed by tobramycin and amikacin with similar degrees of toxicity, followed by
netilmicin which is the least toxic.
|
|
|
Typical Minimal Inhibitory Concentration in mg/ml of Aminoglycosides that will Inhibit 90% (MIC90%) of Clinical Isolates for Species
Available Dosage Forms and Administration
- Administration of gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin and netilmicin are by either IM injection or IV bolus injection by 30 to 60 minutes intermittent infusions. Continuous IV
infusion, although it is applicable but not save.
- They are available as parenteral injection, for IM, IV use or injections for IV infusion in different concentrations. Also, parenteral injection for IV infusion in 0.9
Sodium Chloride solutions are available in different concentration for gentamicin and tobramycin.
|
|
|
Absorption
- Aminoglycosides are very poorly absorbed from GIT. Less than 1% of the dose is absorbed following either oral or rectal administration. The drugs are not inactivated in the
intestine and they are eliminated quantitatively in the feces. Absorption from GIT may be increased in cases of GIT diseases. Also, long-term oral or rectal administration may result in
accumulation of aminoglycosides to toxic levels in patients with renal failure. Instillation of these drugs into body cavities may results in rapid absorption and toxicity. Topical applications
of aminoglycosides for long periods to large wounds, burns or cutaneous ulcers may also lead into toxication specially in patients with renal insuffeciency.
- All of the aminoglycosides are absorbed rapidly from IM sites of injection. Peak concentrations in plasma occur after 30-90 minutes and are similar to those observed 30 minutes
after completion of an intravenous infusion of an equal dose over a 30-minute period.
- Absorption from IM injection may be reduced in critically ill patients due to poor perfusion
|
|
|
Assay Methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radioenzymatic immunoassay (REA)
|
|
|
|
Homogenous enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT)
|
|
|
|
Flourescence immunoassay (FIA)
|
|
|
|
Gas-liquid chromatography (GLC)
|
|
|
|
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
|
|
|
Homogenous EMIT and FIA methodologies have been substantially improved and now represent the two most common assay methods used to measure serum aminoglycosides in the clinical laboratories
Factors Affecting Plasma Levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
It affects greatly, the plasma levels of aminoglycosides. There is a statistical highly significant correlation between serum creatinine or creatinine clearance and
aminoglycoside elimination. Plasma levels increase as the renal functions impaired.
|
|
|
|
|
In healthy adults, cardiac output, renal blood flow, and glomerular filtration decreases with increasing age. Pharmacologic agents which are primarily eliminated by
glomerular filtration rate are influenced by these physiologic change. Elimination and clearance of aminoglycosides decrease with increasing age therefore plasma concentrations consequently increase
with age increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Aminoglycosides distribute primarily to the extracellular fluid compartment which approximates 20-25% of body weight. This physiologic space is susceptible to changes that
my occur during the course of treatment. For examples, patients in initial phases of gram-negative sepsis are febrile, nauseated and vomiting and consequently, are dehydrated. As a result the
extracellular fluid compartment and drug volume are decreased. In contrast, patients with congestive heart failure, patients with peritonitis and patients receiving IV hyperalimentation have
initially large volume of distribution. This volume is changed during the course of treatment as a result of correcting the dehydration or removing the excess fluids. When volume of distribution
decreases, the elimination rate increases and the half-life decreases and vice versa. These changes are all independent of any change in occurring with serum creatinine or other markers of renal
function.
|
|
|
|
|
There is linear relationship between the reciprocal of hematocrit and drug half-life. Hematocrit is altered by changes in patient’s fluid status.
|
|
|
|
|
The drug’s distribution volume increases with increasing excess wieght, presumably due to distribution into extracellular water within the adibose tissue.
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination rate for gentamicin is faster in female than male. Females had a lower volume of distribution probably because of decreased muscle mass and decreased
extracellular fluid per unit of weight.
|
|
|
|
|
The extracellular fluid compartment, total body water, cardiac output, renal flow and glomerular filtration are all increased during the later phases of pregnancy and may
cause an increase in the elimination rate of aminoglycosides.
|
|
|
|
|
Hemodynamic changes secondary to burn (burn patients are hypermetabolic), appear to explain why these patients have an extremely rapid rate of aminoglycoside elimination. In
addition, the extracellular fluid compartment in burn patients can be extremely large immediately post-injury. Consequently, an occasional patient who develops gram-negative sepsis early in the
course of burn resuscitation may have an extremely high distribution volume and a prolonged half-life, even though renal function tests are normal. After post burn diuresis, the volume of
distribution returns to normal.
|
|
|
|
|
The elimination rate of aminoglycosides in pediatric patients is rapid
|
|
|
Internal medicine patients
|
|
|
A large number of internal medicine patients with normal serum creatinine concentration had gentamicin half-life of less than 2.5 hours. However, a substatial number of
these patients had prolonged elimination rates of the drug and required a marked dosage reduction.
|
|
|
|
|
Patients with ascites have an extremely high distribution volume and thus have a prolonged half-life, even though renal function tests are normal.
|
|
|
|
|
Elderly patients have a progressive decrease in glomerular filtration rate with increasing age. However, serum creatinine may be misleading indicator of glomerular
filtration and aminoglycoside elimination since the endogenous production of createnine decreases with increasing age.
|
|
|
Surgery/
Critically ill patients
|
|
|
A wide interpatient variation exist among surgical patients who develop gram-negative sepsis. Surgical patients with infections have many underling medical complications
that may alter the elimination rate of aminoglycosides. Also, critically ill patients may have early signs of organ failure or may in verse be hypermetabolic.
|
|
|
|
|
Patients with cystic fibrosis are hypermetabolic and have higher glomerular filteration rate, therefore they eliminate aminoglycosides very rapidly.
|
|
|
|
|
The newborn, specially the premature patient, experienced very dynamic changes in physiologic parameters such as cardiac output, renal blood flow, renal function and
extracellular fluid. Consequently, the distribution volume, clearance and half-life vary substantially from day to day, and therapeutic concentrations are extremely difficult to attain and maintain
|
|
|
|
|
The elimination rate of aminoglycosides with gynecologic infections is generally rapid and dosage requirements are generally increased in this group of patients
|
|
|
|
|
*(Several factors have been reported to alter the disposition of aminoglycosides and thereby influence serum concentrations and dosage requirements)
References
1. Zaske, D. E. Aminoglycosides. In “Applied Pharmacokinetics: Principle of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring”. Evans,
W. E.; Schentag, J. J.: Jusko, W. J and Relling, M. V. (Eds.). Applied Therapeutics, Inc., Vancouver, WA, USA, 3rd ed.,14-1 (1992).
2. Chambers, H. F. and Sande, M. A. The Aminoglycosides. In “Goodman & Gilman’s: the Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics”. Hardman, J. G.; Molinoff, P. B.; Ruddon, R. W. and Gilman, A. G. (Eds.). McGraw-Hill, New York, St.Louis, San Francisco, Auckland, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Mexico City, Milan, Montereal, New Delhi, San Juan,
Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, 9th ed., 1103 (1996).
3. Matzke, G. R.; Millikin, S. P. and Kovarik. Variability in Pharmacokinetic Values for Gentamicin, Tobramycin and
Netilmicin in Patients with Renal Insufficiency. Cli Pharm., 8, 800 (1989).
4. Bauer, L. A. and Bloutin, R. A. Influence of Age o Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Patients without renal disease.
Comparison with Gentamicin and Tobramycin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 24, 639 (1983).
5. Aarons, L.; Vozeh, S.; Wenk, M.; Weiss, P. and Follath, F. Population Pharmacokinetics of Tobramycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol., 28, 305 (1989).
6. Campoli-Richards, D. N.; Chaplin, S.; Sayce, R. H. and Goa, K. L. Hetilmicin: a Review of its Antibacterial
Activity, Pharmacokinetic Properties and its Therapeutic Use. Drugs, 38, 703 (1989).
7. Barza, M.; Brown, R. B.; Shen, D.; Gibaldi, M. and Weinstein, L. Predictability of Blood Levels of Gentamicin in Man. J Infect Dis., 132, 165 (1975).
8. Korner, B. Gentamicin Therapy Administred by Intermittent Intravenous Injections. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand[B], 241(suppl. 81), 23 (1973).
9. Nielsen, A. B. and Elb, S. the Use of Gentamicin Intravenously. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand[B], 241(suppl. 81), 23 (1973).
10. McEvoy, G. K.; Litvak, K. and Welsh, O. H. (Eds.). Aminoglycosides. In “AHFS Drug Information”. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. Wesconsin Avenue, USA, 39th ed., 56 (1997).
11. Craig, W. A. and Vogelman, B. the Postantibiotic Effect. Ann Intern Med., 106, 900 (1987).
12. Strum, A. W. Netilmicin in the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Single Daily Versus Multiple daily Dosage. J Infect Dis., 159, 931 (1989).
13. Huy, P. T. B.; Meulemans, A.; Wassef, M.; Manuel, C.; Strekers, O. and Amiel, C. Gentamicin Persistence in Rat
Endolymph and Perilemph after a Two-Days Constant Infusion. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 23, 344 (1983).
14. Brummett, R. E. and Fox, K. E. Studies of Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity in Animal Models. In “ the
Aminoglycosides: Microbiology, Clinical Use and Toxicity”. Whelton, A. and Neu, H. C. (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 419 (1982).
15. Smith, C. R.; Baughman, K. L.; Edwards, C. Q.; Rogers, J. F. and Lietman, P. S. Controlled Comparison of Amikacin and Gentamicin. N Engl J Med., 296, 349 (1977).
16. Smith, C. R.; Lipsky, J. J.; Laskin, O. L.; Hellman, D. B.; Millits, E. D.; Longstreth, J. and Lietman, P. S. Double-Blind
Comparison of the Nephrotoxicity and Auditory toxicity of Gentamicin and Tobramycin. N Engl J Med., 302, 1106 (1980).
17. Aronoff, G. R.; Pottratz, S. T.; Brier, M. E.; Walker, N. E.; Fineberg, N. S.; Glant, M. D. and Luft, F. C.
Aminoglycosides Accumulation Kinetics in Rate Renal Parenchyma. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 23, 74 (1983).
18. Lietman, P. S. and Smith, C. R. Aminoglycosides Nephrotoxicity in Humans. J Infect Dis., 5 (Suppl. 2) S284 (1983).
19. Patel, V.; Luft, F. C.; Yum, M. N.; Patel, B.; Zeman, W. and Kleit, S. A. Enzymuria in Gentamycin-Induced Kidney Damage. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 7, 364 (1975).
20. Wiedeman, B. and Atkinson, B. A. Susceptibility to Antibiotic: Species Incidence and Trends. In “ Antibiotics In Laboratory Medicine”. Lorian, V., (Ed.). Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 3rd ed., 962 (1991).
21. Cox, C. E. Gentamicin. Med Clin North Am., 54, 1305 (1970).
22. Breen, K. J.; Bryant, R. E.; Levinson, J. D. and Schenker, S. Neomycin Absorption in Man. Ann Intern Med., 76, 211 (1972).
23. Waterworth, P. M. An enzyme Preparation Inactivating all Penicillins and Cephalosoprins. J Clin Pathol., 26, 596 (1973).
24. Alcid, D. V. and Seligman, S. J.Simplified Assay for Gentamicin in the Presence of Other Antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 4, 569 (1973).
25. Case, R. V. and Mezei, L. M. an Enzymatic Radioassay for Gentamicin. Clin Chem., 24, 2145 (1978).
26. Standefer, J. C. and Saunders, G. C. Enzyme Immunoassay for Gentamicin. Clin Chem., 24, 1903 (1978).
27. Anhalt, J. P. and Brown, S. D. High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Assay of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Clin Chem., 24, 1940 (1978).
28. Mayhew, J. W. and Gorbach, S. L. Assay for Gentamicin and Tobramycin by Gas-Liquid Chromatography. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 14, 851 (1978).
29. Dee, T. H. and Kozin, F. Gentamicin and Tobramycin Penetration into Synovial Fluid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 12, 548(1977).
30. McCracken, G. H. Clinical Pharmacology of Gentamicin in Infants 2 to 24 Months of Age. Am J Dis Chil., 124, 884 (1972).
31. Gill, M. A. and Kem J. W. Altered Gentamicin Distribution in Ascitic Patients. Am J Hosp Pharm., 36, 1704 (1979).
32. Michaelsen, H. and Bergan, T. Pharmacokinetics of Netilmicin in Children with and without Cystic Fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 19(6), 1029 (1981).
|